Should athletes be paid in college

Should College Athletes Be Paid? Yes, But Maybe Not How You Think

If somebody is willing to give A. So they don't play sports so much for the joy as for the desperate need to climb out of poverty and help their families.

At first, it was a great place to watch athletes play sports while making sure the rules were being followed. For men's basketball, that number was 53 percent. Those who dismiss the educational opportunity afforded by their athletic scholarships are often blind to the full long-term value of it.

With proper funds, athletes would be able to afford decent meals and other daily living expenses; they could possibly even send money back home to help family as well. They should be able to profit from their own identities and make money in ways that are legal and in keeping with their abilities.

Let me declare up front I wouldn't be the slightest bit interested in distributing the funds equitably or even paying every college athlete.

Why College Athletes Should be Paid

We would pay athletes because when President Theodore Roosevelt helped create the NCAA inhe had no idea what it would grow into. The student-musician is no less a college student because he struck a lucrative deal.

Second is the NCAA. You know what athletes receive as a bonus?

Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the Debate

Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents.

Yes, pay would vary, just as the universities with the more successful teams receive more television time or money than those with less successful teams. Few college students know how to manage their money well.

In the vast majority of cases, that simply won't happen. The drive for dollars can blind an athlete to the rewards that he or she is already reaping by participating in a sport.

Fair compensation for the full-time expectations A lot of student athletes who come from disadvantaged backgrounds are unprepared for college academics.

Don't get me wrong, paying players out of individual athletic department budgets is beyond impractical; it's probably not feasible. Fun physical exercise A huge range of physical and mental health benefits Better muscle tone and overall physical attractiveness Higher confidence and self-esteem More resilience i.

First, their own coaches. Some of the money is used to help fund athletic scholarships, services, and related expenses. But did you know that a huge number of them actually lose money when all is said and done? It could have negative consequences that ripple into other areas of higher education and impact non-athletes.

It's a fictional golden carrot. Where would the money even come from? But if you removed the scholarship model and paid salaries to college athletes instead, it's doubtful they would wind up with such a good deal.

Yes, pay would vary, just as the universities with the more successful teams receive more television time or money than those with less successful teams. Amateur Olympic athletes are allowed to earn money from autographed memorabilia, endorsements, speaking gigs, and other sources.

And how can we as fans truly enjoy a football game knowing that one player's career-ending injury will leave him saddled with nothing more than a lifetime of pain and doctor's bills?

Should College Athletes be Paid?

You can prepare for the future you want without necessarily involving yourself in college athletics. At that point, the athletes just become employees—promoters of their schools' brands.College athletes should not get paid because they will turn college athletes (student-athletes) into professionals.

Also, a lot of your big sports pay for the little ones that are free to go to like Cross Country, Volleyball, and swimming. The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their.

If the student as athlete can find a way, he/she should be able to endorse products, to have paid-speaking gigs, to sell memorabilia, as Allen Sack, the author and professor at the college of.

The pros list the arguments for why college athletes should be paid and the cons list the arguments for why college athletes should not be paid.

Check out our student loan calculator. Pro #1: College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play. The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their.

At its core, the dispute over whether college athletes should be paid comes down to questions about fairness and values—two things that tend to be very subjective and divisive. Plus, sports and academics often seem to have cross purposes.

Download
Should athletes be paid in college
Rated 4/5 based on 15 review